logo
镁合金板在热拉伸过程中的特殊织构和应变速率敏感性

镁合金板在热拉伸过程中的特殊织构和应变速率敏感性

洪洋
慧慧
中南大学学报(英文版)第32卷, 第3期pp.991-1007纸质出版 2025-03-26
400

本文研究了热轧AZ31镁合金板在100~400 ℃、0.5~100 mm/min下、沿板材法向的单轴热拉伸变形行为,并建立了其热加工图。结果表明:在400 ℃时,功率耗散系数η对应变速率最敏感。在400 ℃,拉伸速率为0.5 mm/min时η为0.89,100 mm/min时η为0.46。在100 ℃拉伸时,拉伸速率为10 mm/min的流动应力比100 mm/min的流动应力低25.94 MPa;在100 ℃、100 mm/min的条件下,存在一个偏转34°的特殊织构组分,有利于基面滑移的激活;此外,动态再结晶吸收位错,有一定的软化效应。晶粒内部的不均匀变形产生的应力促使母晶粒c轴朝有利于基面滑移的方向倾斜,从而形成了偏转34°的特殊织构组分。

镁合金板热变形孪晶特殊织构应变速率

J.Cent.South Univ.(2025) 32: 991-1007

pic

Graphic abstract:

1 Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) alloys have been the center of interest in the automotive, transportation and aerospace industries due to their low density, high strength-to-weight ratios and good machinability [1-3]. The performance of Mg alloys is highly correlated with their microstructure [4-7]. The low slip systems at room temperature lead to low plasticity, thus limiting their wide application [8]. Furthermore, Mg sheets are usually produced by hot rolling or hot extrusion processes, and basal texture is inevitable and further results in the poor plasticity and formability [9].

Therefore, weakening basal texture of Mg sheets is an effective method to obtain Mg sheets with excellent plasticity and formability [10, 11]. TU et al [12] adopted equal channel angular rolling and continuous bending to weaken the basal texture at 240 ℃. With increasing rolling speed, the basal pole completely splits toward rolling direction (RD), and Erichsen value grows to 7.4 mm at room temperature. HUANG et al [13] prepared AZ80 Mg alloy through differential speed rolling (DSR) at 300 ℃, and 15° tilt to the RD of the DSR-processed sheets was observed and the Erichsen value increased by 22% at room temperature.

Pre-twinning is another method which has been widely concerned to improve the plasticity and formability of Mg sheets [14, 15], and its positive effects can be summarized as follows: 1) Twins provide additional deformation modes and enhance deformability of Mg alloys at low temperatures [16]; 2) The interaction between twins is conducive to accelerating nucleation of recrystallization [17]; 3) Twins can rotate c-axes of grains to obtain favorable orientation, thus enhancing the sustained deformability [18]. Among the common twin types, the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) of tensile twin (TT) is the lowest, and TT is easily activated under tensile loads parallel to the c-axis of Mg grains [19, 20].

In addition to the significant effect of twinning on the microstructural regulation, the special texture of Mg alloys also plays a crucial role in determining microstructural properties [21-24]. WANG et al [22] demonstrated that the Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Mn alloy, which exhibits a special <0001>Mg// extrusion direction texture following hot extrusion, provides the best mechanical isotropy in both as-extruded and as-aged conditions. LIU et al [7] successfully fabricated Mg alloy sheets featuring a circular texture through multidirectional rolling, which resulted in enhanced ductility along both RD and transverse direction (TD) and weaker in-plane yield anisotropy when compared to samples with a TD-tilted texture. Furthermore, HAN et al [24] introduced an abnormal bimodal texture in AZ31 Mg alloy sheets utilizing equal channel angular rolling and continuous bending process with subsequent annealing. The total rolling reduction achieved in the sheet exhibiting the abnormal bimodal texture reached 39.2%, which is more than double the reduction of 18.3% observed in sheets characterized by a strong basal texture.

Generally, the relationship between deformation conditions and flow stress can be described by establishing the constitutive relationship of metal materials [25]. Through hot processing maps of the material based on the dynamic material model (DMM), the machinability of deformed metal materials can be evaluated, and the microstructure evolution and deformation mechanism can be predicted, thus optimizing the process parameters [26]. Nowadays, DMM has been widely applied to Mg alloys, but the temperature range of hot-working diagrams of Mg alloys is between 200 and 500 ℃. So far, there have been few studies on the hot working areas at low temperatures [27-29].

In this study, tensile tests along normal direction (ND) were performed on AZ31 Mg sheets in a wider strain rate (0.5-100 mm/min) and temperature (100-400 ℃) range. The microstructure evolution of Mg sheets at 100 and 400 ℃ was analyzed to explain an abnormal phenomenon that flow stress at 100 mm/min decreases compared with that at 10 mm/min at 100 ℃. Conclusions in this paper will provide some valuable suggestions for the forming of Mg alloys at low temperatures.

2 Material and methods

Hot rolled AZ31 Mg alloy sheet with a thickness of 70 mm was selected in this study. The raw sheet was cut into pieces with dimensions of 3 mm (RD) ×50 mm (TD) × 70 mm (ND). The hot tensile test employs dog-bone shaped specimens with a nominal gage size of 15 mm × 4 mm, as demonstrated in Figure 1(a). Prior to the tension tests, the residual stresses of the samples were relieved via heating at 200 ℃ for 6 h. Hot tensile tests were performed on Gleeble-3800 simulator along the ND in vacuum (degree of vacuum is 0.1 torr), as shown in Figure 1(b). The deformation temperatures (T) are 100, 200, 300 and 400 ℃, respectively, and the strain rates (pic) are 0.5, 2, 10 and 100 mm/min, respectively.

Figure 1
Schematic diagram of fabricating tensile specimens and related hot tensile tests: (a) Fabrication of tensile specimens machined from hot rolling sheet; (b) Hot tensile tests; (c) The IPF and {0001} PF of AR sample
pic

The specimens for electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) observation were mechanically ground on 2000# and 3000# SiC papers, and then electron-polished in a 5% perchloric acid and 95% ethanol at 0.1 A and 45 V for 75 s. EBSD was conducted on a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tescan S8000), equipped with an Oxford EBSD system and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The obtained EBSD data were imported into Channel 5 software for analysis. Pole figure (PF), inverse pole figure (IPF) maps, misorientation angles, kernel average misorientation (KAM) maps, Schmid factor (SF) distribution and a series of EBSD subsets were obtained. Figure 1(b) shows the scanned area and coordinate system of the EBSD sample. Microstructure of the as-received (AR) sample is presented in Figure 1(c), which exhibits a typical {0001} strong basal texture with a maximum intensity of 13.19. Most of the grains are equiaxed, with an average value of about 30.14 μm.

3 Results

3.1 True stress-strain curves

Figure 2 shows the true stress-strain curves of AZ31 alloys. For the same deformation temperature, the ultimate tensile strength increases with increasing strain rate in the range of 0.5 mm/min to 100 mm/min, except at 100 ℃. The flow stress curves at 100 ℃ under different strain rates are basically the same. However, at high temperatures (200-400 ℃), the flow stress curves present a significant change at different strain rates.

Figure 2
True stress-true strain curves of AZ31 alloys under deformation temperature of 100 ℃-400 ℃ with different deformation strain rate: (a) 0.5 mm/min; (b) 2 mm/min; (c) 10 mm/min; (d) 100 mm/min
pic

It can be seen from Figures 2(a)-(c) that the decrease of flow stress is caused by dynamic softening at lower strain rates (0.5-10 mm/min), especially for 300-400 ℃. The flow stress is small and the change of flow stress is also small from 0.5 to 10 mm/min at 300-400 ℃, which is a typical feature of complete dynamic recrystallization (DRX) [30]. In contrast, the rapidly increasing flow stress at 100 mm/min is due to the fraction of TTs being enhanced at high strain rates, and twinning dominates the deformation in tension tests at high temperatures and high strain rates [31].

Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that the difference in mechanical behavior among various temperatures may be related to twinning and DRX. The following content first gives the hot processing map and then uses EBSD to reveal microstructural evolution in different conditions.

3.2 Activation energy of hot deformation and constitutive equation

Generally, the steady flow stress and strain rate description is preferred for the exponential relationship under relatively lower stresses, as shown in Eq. (1). In high stress, the relationship between them is suitable for the power exponent, as shown in Eq. (2). In this paper, the modified hyperbolic sinusoidal Arrhenius equation [32, 33] was used to establish a constitutive model of AZ31 Mg alloy, as shown in Eq. (3):

pic (1)pic (2)pic (3)

where pic, T, R, Q and σ are the strain rate (s-1), the absolute temperature (K), the gas constant (8.314 J/(mol·K)), the activation energy (J/mol), and flow stress (MPa), respectively. A1, A2, A, n1, n, β and α are all material constants, where α=β/n1. The material constants in the above constitutive equations are calculated from the mechanical property data obtained in the tensile tests described above (Figure 2). Combine Eqs. (1)-(3) and take the natural logarithm for both sides of the equation. Figures 3(a)-(c) show the lnσ-lnpic, σ-lnpic, ln[sinh(ασ)]-lnpic linear relationships, respectively. According to the average value of slopes of the above linear fitting, β, n1 and n can be calculated as 0.06893, 10.661 and 10.735, respectively. Natural logarithm on both sides of Eq. (3), results in Eq. (4):

pic (4)
Figure 3
Plots of (a) lnσ-lnpic; (b) σ-lnpic; (c) ln[sinh(ασ)]-lnpic; (d) T-1-ln[sinh(ασ)]; (e) ln[sinh(ασ)]-lnZ
pic

Figure 3(d) shows T-1-ln[sinh(ασ)] linear relationships and the slope of T-1-ln[sinh(ασ)] is b. The combination of R, n and b can calculate the value of Q, which is 134.6 kJ/mol. The widely used Zener-Holomon parameter to describe the effect of temperature and strain rate on the hot deformation behavior of metallic materials, Z, is introduced, as shown in Eq. (5) [34]. Through numerical variations of Eqs. (3) and (5), and organize them to get Eq. (6):

pic (5)pic (6)

Figure 3(e) shows the ln [sinh(ασ)]-lnZ linear relationship, and regression analysis of Eq. (6) gives A=5.523×1012. Then all constants in the constitutive equation are obtained. Finally, construct the Z parameter constitutive equation and constitutive equation of AZ31 alloy during hot tension as shown in Eqs. (7) and (8).

pic (7)pic (8)
3.3 Processing map prediction

Processing maps can be divided into three types based on mathematical models, including atomic model [35], polar reciprocity model [36] and DMM [37]. Considering the flow stress curves under different conditions in Figure 2, the most significant difference in flow stress between the conditions occurs when the strain reaches 0.2. Therefore, the hot processing map of AZ31 alloy under strain of 0.2 is established by DMM.

According to the DMM, the external input energy (P) consists of dissipation (G) and dissipation covariates (J):

pic (9)

where σ is the flow stress; pic is the strain rate. The ratio of the J and G is depended on the strain rate sensitivity index (m) of the material:

pic (10)

When temperature and strain are certain, the relationship between stress and strain rate conforms to the dynamic continuity equation:

pic (11)

Generally, m is between 0 and 1, and it is defined as a non-ideal linear state J. However, the dissipation covariance is in the maximum state (Jmax) when m=1, which is linear dissipation in the ideal state, and J and Jmax can be represented by Eq. (12) and ():

pic (12)

In general, hot processing performance is characterized by introducing the power dissipation factor (η), which is obtained by comparing the instantaneous J occurring in the work piece with Jmax.

pic (14)

Furthermore, the Prasad criterion suggests that deformation instability occurs at a given deformation temperature if J and the strain rate are in accordance with Eqs. (15) and (16):

pic (15)pic (16)

Combining Eqs. (10), (12) and (16), the equation for the flow instability criterion is:

pic (17)

Figure 4 shows the three-dimensional hot processing map of AZ31 alloy under strain of 0.2. The contour lines are power dissipation rate values, the gray filled area is the region of instability, and the rainbow area is the region of preferred process parameters for the hot working process. The instability zone is composed of two parts: A and B, and the corresponding deformation parameters are 0.001-0.11 s-1 (0.9-100 mm/min) at 200-214 ℃ and 0.001-0.01 s-1 (0.9-9 mm/min) at 380-400 ℃. A higher η value means that the machining region has a high plastic mobility and good machinability [38]. The AZ31 alloy has high η values at high temperatures and low strain rates, with the highest η value of 0.89 at 400 ℃ and 0.00056 s-1 (0.5 mm/min). The main reason may be that the microstructure transformation is sufficient under high temperature and low strain rate.

Figure 4
Hot processing map of AZ31 sheets
pic

Figure 4 shows that the effect of strain rate on η at 300-400 ℃ is greater than that at 200 ℃, especially at 400 ℃. The η generally increases sharply (from 0.18 to 0.89) with a decrease in the strain rate at 400 ℃. Considering the most tremendous changes of η at 400 ℃, so take two conditions of 400 ℃-0.5 mm/min and 400 ℃- 100 mm/min as examples to investigate the microstructures, and the samples were named 400-0.5 and 400-100, respectively.

Another interesting phenomenon is that there is a slight decrease in the flow stress when the strain rate rises from 10 mm/min to 100 mm/min at 100 ℃ (marked by red arrows in Figures 2(c) and (d)), resulting in a negative m value, which does not conform to the conventional range of m values in Eq. (11). Additionally, there are few literature reports on traditional magnesium alloy hot working diagrams that provide theoretical support for this anomalous phenomenon at 100 ℃ [27-29]. Hence, two samples of 10 mm/min and 100 mm/min at 100 ℃ named 100-10 and 100-100 respectively are also selected to supplement the understanding of the relationship between mechanical properties and microstructures of Mg sheets at low temperature.

4 Discussion

4.1 Microstructure evolution of 400-0.5 and 400-100

Figure 5 shows the EBSD results of 400-0.5 and 400-100. TT boundaries, pic compression twins (CT) boundaries and pic secondary twins (ST) boundaries are marked by red lines, green lines and yellow lines in Figures 5(c) and (d), respectively. CT and ST are hardly observed in 400-0.5 and 400-100. Most grains are equiaxed and almost no TTs are observed in 400-0.5. A small peak at ~38° in 400-0.5 in Figure 5(g) suggests the occurrence of DRX (indicated by black arrow) [39]. A large number of TTs are observed in 400-100, and peaks at ~86° in Figure 5(g) also indicate that TTs are activated [40]. Figure 5(h) represents the average grain sizes of 400-0.5 and 400-100 as 32.95 μm and 17.01 μm, respectively. The former can be attributed to the grain growth due to the increase in temperature, and the latter to the subdivision effect of TT.

Figure 5
(a, b) IPFs, (c, d) twin boundaries distribution, (e, f) PFs, (g) Misorientation angle distribution, and (h) grain size distribution: (a, c, e) 400-0.5; (b, d, f) 400-100
pic

Figures 5(e) and (f) show that the basal texture intensity of 400-0.5 (11.79) and 400-100 (5.53) decreases after hot tension. The weakening of basal texture in 400-0.5 can be attributed to the increased chance of initiating non-basal slips at high temperature of 400 ℃ [41]. For 400-100, TTs play a significant role in weakening of basal texture via c-axes rotation of ~86° [42, 43].

In the machinability field, the variation of η corresponds to the degree of DRX [44], because DRX promotes the stable flow and good workability of materials during deformation. The distribution of recrystallized grains (blue area), substructured grains (yellow area) and deformed grains (red area) is given in Figures 6(a) and (b). The volume fraction of DRXed grains is 72.85% in 400-0.5. As the strain rate enhances to 100 mm/min, the volume fraction of DRXed grains decreases to 12.31%. In 400-0.5, the η reaches the peak (0.89) and DRX is the dominant mechanism of microstructure evolution. Contrarily, the η (0.46) decreases and the twinning is the dominant mechanism in 400-100.

Figure 6
(a, b) Recrystallization rate of samples, and (c, d) KAM maps: (a, c) 400-0.5; (b, d) 400-100
pic

Both the twinning and DRX behavior are related to the accumulated strain energy. KAM maps are used to determine the stored strain energy [45], as shown in Figures 6(c) and (d). The average KAM value increases from 0.512 at 400-0.5 to 1.147 at 400-100 with increasing strain rate. It should be noted that DRX and dislocation density during hot tension are closely related to the strain rate. The dislocation density and the fraction of tensile twin boundaries (TBs) are higher for samples at high strain rates compared to those at low strain rates.

To better explain the differences between the two samples mentioned above, a schematic map of the microstructural evolution is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7
Schematic illustration of the microstructural evolution under different strain rates for (a) initial samples, (b-d) low-strain-rate samples and (e-g) high-strain-rate samples
pic

1) During deformation, the generated energy is retained in the form of dislocations [46]. During the initial stage of deformation, dislocations with a high density are formed in the grains, and the density of dislocations also increases with increasing strain rate [47], as shown in Figures 7(a), (b) and (e).

2) The large amount of dislocation entanglement after deformation makes the intracrystalline deformation enter into the second stage. At low strain rates, the large amount of dislocation entanglement will release energy through dislocation rearrangement: the formation of low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) and the bulging of grain boundaries (GBs) [48-50], as shown in Figures 7(b) and (c). With the increase of strain rate, plastic deformation occurs in a very short time, which leads to the increase of CRSS for non-basal slip [51], so the dislocation entanglement is difficult to be released in a short time. Meanwhile, the number of LAGBs decreases, and the tendency of twinning increases (twin embryos can be generated in the dislocations entangled) [52, 53], as shown in Figures 7(e) and (f).

3) As the deformation continues, the LAGBs absorb dislocations and increase their disorientation to form high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs), forming boundaries of new DRX grains [54], as shown in Figures 7(c) and (d). At high strain rates, the twin embryos transform into intact TTs by absorbing dislocations, and the formation of twins results in an increase in TB, and then results in the impeding of dislocation slip [55], causing dislocations to stack around the TB and leading to higher dislocation densities [56, 57], as shown in Figures 7(f) and (g).

Therefore, the difference of η at different strain rates at 400 ℃ is closely related to the absorption and dissipation of dislocations. The dislocations are absorbed at low strain rate via DRX, while they are restricted at high strain rate due to TTs generation, which is harmful to the sustainable flow behavior.

4.2 Flow stress decrease and texture evolution at 100 ℃

Figure 8 displays the microstructures of 100-10 and 100-100. CT and ST are hardly observed, while TTs account for the largest proportion, as shown in Figures 8(c) and (d). Besides, Figure 8(h) shows the number of TBs has a slight increase (from 21.9% in 100-10 to 26.8% in 100-100). Figure 8(g) represents that the average grain sizes of 100-10 and 100-100 are 10.17 μm and 9.12 μm, respectively, which can be attributed to the subdivision effect of TTs.

Figure 8
(a, b) IPFs, (c, d) twin boundaries distribution and (e, f) PFs, (g) Grain size distribution, and (h) misorientation angle distribution: (a, c, e) 100-10; (b, d, f) 100-100
pic

Figures 8(e) and (f) show that basal texture component is almost eliminated in 100-10 and 100-100. The maximum intensity of 100-10 and 100-100 is 4.06 and 3.84, respectively, both of which are smaller than that of AR. AR exhibits basal texture, and SFs of six variants of TTs are approximate when tensile loading is along the ND, resulting in similar occurrence probability of TT variants [58]. That is mainly responsible for the even distribution of ~86° tilt of c-axes [59], which is particularly obvious in 100-100.

There is a subtle flow stress decline of 25.94 MPa in 100-100, compared to that of 100-10. The final flow stress of materials is the competition between hardening and softening during tensile deformation, and the corresponding mechanisms are as follows: 1) Hardening due to the reduced average grain size caused by TBs, which is also called dynamic Hall-Petch effect [60]; 2) TBs acting as obstacles for dislocation movement, resulting in dislocation entanglement and pinning and then resulting in hardening [61, 62]; 3) TTs as preferential nucleation sites of DRX and DRX can consuming and reorienting parent grains, then causing softening effect [63].

First, according to the Hall-Petch equation (pic) [60], the smaller the average grain sizes, the higher the flow stress. However, it is obvious that the grain size of 100-10 (10.17 μm) is larger than that of 100-100 (9.12 μm), which is against the law, suggesting that grain size reduction is not the main factor.

Then, the influence of dislocation density can be quantitatively measured by KAM values, which decreases from 1.304 in 100-10 to 1.219 in 100-100, as shown in Figure 9(c) and (d). As the increase of strain rates, the volume fraction of TTs grows, resulting in dislocation density remaining stable or increasing [64], which is also against the KAM results. Hence, DRX may play a role in the reduction of dislocation density [49-65]. Both increasing strain rate and inducing TTs can promote DRX [66]. With the deformation rate increasing, the dislocation slips are difficult to complete in a short time [53] and large deformation energy can be generated, which is conducive to the acceleration of DRX to some extent [67]. Figures 9(a) and (b) show that the number of DRXed grains increases with the increase of strain rate, so DRX is partly responsible for the decrease of dislocation density, which provides a softening effect to some extent.

Figure 9
(a, b) Recrystallization rate of samples, and (c, d) KAM maps: (a, c) 100-10; (b, d) 100-100
pic

Except for the influence factors discussed above, texture altering is also closely associated with the change of flow stress [18]. A significant difference can be observed from the PF of 100-10 and 100-100 in Figures 8(e) and (f), where the maximum intensity is formed at a deviation of approximately 34° from ND at the PF of 100-100. Figure 10 shows the SF distribution of different slip systems. Compared with the SF of basal <a> slip of AR (0.214), the values of 100-10 (0.292) and 100-100 (0.291) significantly increase, while the SFs of other slip systems decrease obviously, especially the prismatic <a> slip, which is because TTs help to enhance basal slip by rotating c-axes [68].

Figure 10
SF maps for various slip systems in specimens at (a-d) AR, (e-h) 100-10 and (i-l) 100-100: (a, e, i) Basal <a> slip system; (b, f, j) Prismatic <a> slip system; (c, g, k) Pyramidal <a> slip system; (d, h, l) Pyramidal <c+a> slip system
pic

The CRSS of non-basal slips of Mg is much larger than that of basal slip at room temperature [69], and the average SFs of non-basal slips in 100-10 and 100-100 are approximate, which can be clearly seen from Figures 10(f)-(h), (j)-(l). So, in this part the effect of basal slip on flow stress is mainly discussed. Figures 10(e) and (i) show that grains with their c-axes parallel to TD/RD or rotating from ND to TD present small SFs of basal slip. By contrast, the grains with their c-axes parallel to ~45° (marked by black ellipse in Figure 10(i)) have a higher SF of basal slip.

Purple circle and the black rectangle in Figures 10(e) and (i) illustrate the regions with the maximum texture intensity (Figures 8(e) and (f)) in 100-10 and 100-100, respectively. The average SFs of basal <a> slip of these two regions are calculated, which are ~0.38 in 100-100 and ~0.21 in 100-10, indicating that the special 34° texture components are favorable to activation of basal slip and lead to the decrease of flow stress.

Regions marked by white rectangle plotted in Figure 8(b) are enlarged in Figure 11 to investigate the special 34° texture component, and the corresponding {0001} PF map is given. Figures 11(a) and (b) show that two kinds of twin variants are observed in regions A and B. It can be seen in Figure 11(c) that the rotation angles between the matrix grains (M1 and M2) and the corresponding twin variants are larger than 86°, which can be attributed to excessive number of twins causing the deflection of matrix grain orientation [70, 71].

Figure 11
The enlarged grain maps of matrix and twins within selected grains of 100-100 sample: (a, b) IPF; (c) Corresponding {0001} PF map and (d, e) SF distribution maps for basal slip systems; (f, g) KAM maps and (h) point-to-origin and point-to-point misorientations map along the white lines (line 1, line 2 and line 3); (a, d, f) Region A; (b, e, g) Region B
pic

Figures 11(d) and (e) show the SF of basal <a> slip of regions A and B. The SF of T1 is 0.22 and SF of T2 is 0.44 in region A. The SF of T3 is only ~0.12, while the SF of T4 is four times that of T3 in region B. Difference in SFs between twin laminas results in different activated values of basal slips in TTs in the same grain. Figures 11(f) and (g) show that abundant dislocations accumulate in the TTs with low SFs, and there is nearly no dislocation accumulation in the TTs with high SFs. This inhomogeneity of intra-grain deformation generates stress and causes c-axes of matrix grains to deflect [72].

Figure 11(h) shows the point-to-point and point-to-origin directional deviations along lines 1-3 in M1 and M2. Through the point-to-point curves, it can be noticed that the misorientation of line 1 gradually increases to ~4.8°, thus indicating that the internal distortion of M1 is small. However, the misorientation of line 2 and line 3 increases to ~17.5° and ~14.5°, respectively, which indicates that the internal distortion of M2 is larger. It can be inferred that when more difficult-to-slip twin variants lead to dislocation accumulation, the matrix grains containing these TTs are prone to tilt to a direction favorable to slip.

In summary, the decrease of flow stress at strain of 0.2 in 100-100 is partly because of the softening effect brought by DRX via absorbing dislocations, but the main reason is that the special ~34° texture component promotes the activity of basal slip. The strengthening effect brought by grain refinement is negligible.

5 Conclusions

The deformation behavior of Mg sheets subjected to uniaxial tension at temperatures ranging from 100 to 400 ℃ and strain rates ranging from 0.5 to 100 mm/min was investigated, and the following conclusions can be drawn:

1) The best processing parameters are 400 ℃ and 0.00056 s-1 (0.5 mm/min). Mg alloy sheets experience flow instabilities in the strain rate

and temperature ranges of 0.001-0.112 s-1 (0.9- 100 mm/min) and 200-214 ℃ and 0.001-0.01 s-1 (0.9-9 mm/min) and 380-400 ℃.

2) The strain rate shows η is the most sensitive to strain rate at 400 ℃ via absorption and dissipation of dislocations. 400-0.5 possesses a higher η of 0.89 because of its lower dislocation density of 0.512, which can be attributed to absorption of DRX. However, 400-100 possesses a lower η of 0.46 with higher dislocation density of 1.147, and the reason is that dislocations tangle with each other and are pinned at TBs.

3) The flow stress presents a slight decrease of 25.94 MPa in 100-100 compared to that of 100-10, and it is closely associated with the special ~34° texture component in 100-100, which is favorable to activation of basal slip. Besides, DRX also provides softening effect to some extent by absorbing dislocations.

4) Difference in SFs between twin laminas results in the inhomogeneity of intra-grain deformation, which generates stress that helps matrix grains tilt in a direction favorable to basal slip, and finally, a novel texture component of 34° appears.

References
1DROZDENKO D, YAMASAKI M, MÁTHIS K, et al.

Optimization of mechanical properties of dilute Mg-Zn-Y alloys prepared by rapid solidification

[J]. Materials & Design, 2019, 181: 107984. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019. 107984.
百度学术谷歌学术
2TAYLOR R H, CURTAROLO S, HART G L W.

Guiding the experimental discovery of magnesium alloys

[J]. Physical Review B, 2011, 84(8): 084101. DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84. 084101.
百度学术谷歌学术
3ZHANG Zhi, ZHANG Jing-huai, XIE Jin-shu, et al.

Developing a Mg alloy with ultrahigh room temperature ductility via grain boundary segregation and activation of non-basal slips

[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2023, 162: 103548. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103548.
百度学术谷歌学术
4HU Zhi-qing, GUO Chao-fan, LI Hong-mei.

Influence of AZ31 sheet treated by cryogenic on punch shearing

[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(6): 1582-1591. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4114-7.
百度学术谷歌学术
5JI Ya-feng, DUAN Jin-rui, YUAN Hao, et al.

Effect of variable thickness cross rolling on edge crack and microstructure gradient of AZ31 magnesium alloy

[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(4): 1124-1132. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-4973-1.
百度学术谷歌学术
6KHOUBROU I, NAMI B, MIRESMAEILI S M, et al.

Evolution of microstructure, texture and mechanical properties of ECAP-processed ZK60 magnesium alloy

[J]. Metals and Materials International, 2025, 31(1): 227-236. DOI: 10.1007/s12540-024-01730-9.
百度学术谷歌学术
7LIU Xiao, HE Dan-dan, ZHU Bi-wu, et al.

The ordered orientation gradient “sandwich” texture induced high strength-ductility in AZ31 magnesium alloy

[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2024, 253: 116296. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat. 2024.116296.
百度学术谷歌学术
8GUAN Di-kai, WYNNE B, GAO Jun-heng, et al.

Basal slip mediated tension twin variant selection in magnesium WE43 alloy

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2019, 170: 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.018.
百度学术谷歌学术
9ZHANG Hua, CHENG Wei-li, FAN Jian-feng, et al.

Improved mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets by repeated cold rolling and annealing using a small pass reduction

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 637: 243-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.057.
百度学术谷歌学术
10ZHANG Hua, JIN Wei, FAN Jian-feng, et al.

Grain refining and improving mechanical properties of a warm rolled AZ31 alloy plate

[J]. Materials Letters, 2014, 135: 31-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.130.
百度学术谷歌学术
11JIANG M G, YAN H, CHEN R S.

Microstructure, texture and mechanical properties in an as-cast AZ61 Mg alloy during multi-directional impact forging and subsequent heat treatment

[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 87: 891-900. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.052.
百度学术谷歌学术
12TU Jian, ZHOU Tao, LIU Lei, et al.

Effect of rolling speeds on texture modification and mechanical properties of the AZ31 sheet by a combination of equal channel angular rolling and continuous bending at high temperature

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, 768: 598-607. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.242.
百度学术谷歌学术
13HUANG Xin-sheng, SUZUKI K, SAITO N.

Microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ80 magnesium alloy sheet processed by differential speed rolling

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2009, 508(1, 2): 226-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.052.
百度学术谷歌学术
14SONG Bo, XIN Ren-long, ZHENG Xuan, et al.

Activation of multiple twins by pre-tension and compression to enhance the strength of Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy plates

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 621: 100-104. DOI: 10. 1016/j.msea.2014.10.061.
百度学术谷歌学术
15LI Xin-feng, LI Qi-zhen.

Effect of pre-compression on microstructural evolution, mechanical property and strengthening mechanism of AZ31 alloy

[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2020, 55(25): 11637-11649. DOI: 10. 1007/s10853-020-04724-1.
百度学术谷歌学术
16STAROSELSKY A, ANAND L.

A constitutive model for hcp materials deforming by slip and twinning application to magnesium alloy AZ31B

[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2003, 19(10): 1843-1864. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00039-1.
百度学术谷歌学术
17LEE J Y, YUN Y S, SUH B C, et al.

Comparison of static recrystallization behavior in hot rolled Mg-3Al-1Zn and Mg-3Zn-0.5Ca sheets

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2014, 589: 240-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.210.
百度学术谷歌学术
18SONG Bo, YANG Qing-shan, ZHOU Tao, et al.

Texture control by {101¯2} twinning to improve the formability of Mg alloys: A review

[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2019, 35(10): 2269-2282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.045.
百度学术谷歌学术
19KOIKE J.

Enhanced deformation mechanisms by anisotropic plasticity in polycrystalline Mg alloys at room temperature

[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2005, 36(7): 1689-1696. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-005-0032-4.
百度学术谷歌学术
20JIANG Lan, JONAS J J, LUO A A, et al.

Influence of {101¯2} extension twinning on the flow behavior of AZ31 Mg alloy

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2007, 445: 302-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.069.
百度学术谷歌学术
21XU Jun, JIANG Bin, SONG Jiang-feng, et al.

Unusual texture formation in Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy sheets processed by slope extrusion

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2018, 732: 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.100.
百度学术谷歌学术
22WANG Kui, WANG Jing-feng, HUANG Song, et al.

Formation of an abnormal texture in Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Mn alloy and its effect on mechanical properties by altering extrusion parameters

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2022, 831: 142270. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142270.
百度学术谷歌学术
23SHI B Q, ZHANG R D, SHANG X L, et al.

Reducing mechanical anisotropy by formation of symmetrical ring-like texture via final-pass heavy reduction rolling in Mg alloy

[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 24: 4315-4328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.062.
百度学术谷歌学术
24HAN Xiu-zhu, HU Li, JIA Dong-yong, et al.

Role of unusual double-peak texture in significantly enhancing cold rolling formability of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet

[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2023, 33(8): 2351-2364. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(23)66264-8.
百度学术谷歌学术
25HAO Jian-qiang, ZHANG Jin-shan, XU Chun-xiang, et al.

Optimum parameters and kinetic analysis for hot working of a solution-treated Mg-Zn-Y-Mn magnesium alloy

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, 754: 283-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.292.
百度学术谷歌学术
26CAI Zhi-wei, CHEN Fu-xiao, MA Feng-jie, et al.

Dynamic recrystallization behavior and hot workability of AZ41M magnesium alloy during hot deformation

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 670: 55-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.033.
百度学术谷歌学术
27MEKONEN M N, STEGLICH D, BOHLEN J, et al.

Mechanical characterization and constitutive modeling of Mg alloy sheets

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2012, 540: 174-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.122.
百度学术谷歌学术
28SHEIKHANI A, ROUMINA R, MAHMUDI R.

Hot deformation behavior of an extruded AZ31 alloy doped with rare-earth elements

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2021, 852: 156961. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156961.
百度学术谷歌学术
29SHANG Xin, ZHOU Jie, WANG Xun, et al.

Optimizing and identifying the process parameters of AZ31 magnesium alloy in hot compression on the base of processing maps

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015, 629: 155-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.251.
百度学术谷歌学术
30WANG Y N, HUANG J C.

The role of twinning and untwinning in yielding behavior in hot-extruded Mg-Al-Zn alloy

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2007, 55(3): 897-905. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.010.
百度学术谷歌学术
31ULACIA I, DUDAMELL N V, GÁLVEZ F, et al.

Mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of a Mg AZ31 sheet at dynamic strain rates

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(8): 2988-2998. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.029.
百度学术谷歌学术
32SHAMSOLHODAEI A, ZAREI-HANZAKI A, GHAMBARI M, et al.

The high temperature flow behavior modeling of NiTi shape memory alloy employing phenomenological and physical based constitutive models: A comparative study

[J]. Intermetallics, 2014, 53: 140-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.015.
百度学术谷歌学术
33MIRZADEH H, NAJAFIZADEH A, MOAZENY M.

Flow curve analysis of 17-4PH stainless steel under hot compression test

[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2009, 40(12): 2950-2958. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-0029-5.
百度学术谷歌学术
34MANDAL S, RAKESH V, SIVAPRASAD P V, et al.

Constitutive equations to predict high temperature flow stress in a Ti-modified austenitic stainless steel

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2009, 500(1, 2): 114-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.019.
百度学术谷歌学术
35RAJ R.

Development of a processing map for use in warm-forming and hot-forming processes

[J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1981, 12(6): 1089-1097. DOI: 10.1007/BF02643490.
百度学术谷歌学术
36RAJAGOPALACHARY T, KUTUMBARAO V V.

Intrinsic hot workability map for a titanium alloy IMI685

[J]. Scripta Materialia, 1996, 35(3): 311-316. DOI: 10.1016/1359-6462(96)00135-2.
百度学术谷歌学术
37PRASAD Y V R K, GEGEL H L, DORAIVELU S M, et al.

Modeling of dynamic material behavior in hot deformation: Forging of Ti-6242

[J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1984, 15(10): 1883-1892. DOI: 10.1007/BF02664902.
百度学术谷歌学术
38ZHANG Qian, CHEN Zi-yi, LI Quan-an, et al.

Deformation behavior characterized by reticular shear bands and long chain twins in Mg-Gd-Nd(-Zn)-Zr alloys

[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 15: 5326-5342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.020.
百度学术谷歌学术
39SAKAI T, BELYAKOV A, KAIBYSHEV R, et al.

Dynamic and post-dynamic recrystallization under hot, cold and severe plastic deformation conditions

[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2014, 60: 130-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013. 09.002.
百度学术谷歌学术
40SONG Bo, XIN Ren-long, SUN Li-yun, et al.

Enhancing the strength of rolled ZK60 alloys via the combined use of twinning deformation and aging treatment

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2013, 582: 68-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.047.
百度学术谷歌学术
41WONG T W, HADADZADEH A, WELLS M A.

High temperature deformation behavior of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy

[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2018, 251: 360-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec. 2017.09.006.
百度学术谷歌学术
42KNEZEVIC M, LEVINSON A, HARRIS R, et al.

Deformation twinning in AZ31: Influence on strain hardening and texture evolution

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(19): 6230-6242. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.041.
百度学术谷歌学术
43TIAN Jing, DENG Jia-fei, SHI Quan-xin, et al.

Effect of temperature field and stress field of different crack behavior on twins and dislocations under Mg alloy rolling

[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(19): 5668. DOI: 10.3390/ma14195668.
百度学术谷歌学术
44WU H Y, WU Cheng-tao, YANG Jie-chen, et al.

Hot workability analysis of AZ61 Mg alloys with processing maps

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2014, 607: 261-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.017.
百度学术谷歌学术
45JIANG M G, XU C, YAN H, et al.

Quasi-in-situ observing the rare earth texture evolution in an extruded Mg-Zn-Gd alloy with bimodal microstructure

[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2021, 9(5): 1797-1805. DOI: 10.1016/j.jma. 2020.09.001.
百度学术谷歌学术
46HULL D,BACON D J.

Observation of dislocations

[M]// Introduction to Dislocations. Fifth Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011: 21-46. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096672-4.00002-5.
百度学术谷歌学术
47ZHOU Nai-gen, WEI Xiu-qin, ZHOU Lang.

Formation of dislocations in the growth of silicon along different crystallographic directions: A molecular dynamics study

[J]. Crystals, 2018, 8(9): 346. DOI: 10.3390/cryst8090346.
百度学术谷歌学术
48WINNING M, ROLLETT A D.

Transition between low and high angle grain boundaries

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2005, 53(10): 2901-2907. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.005.
百度学术谷歌学术
49HUANG K, LOGÉ R E.

A review of dynamic recrystallization phenomena in metallic materials

[J]. Materials & Design, 2016, 111: 548-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.012.
百度学术谷歌学术
50JORGE-BADIOLA D, IZA-MENDIA A, GUTIÉRREZ I.

Evaluation of intragranular misorientation parameters measured by EBSD in a hot worked austenitic stainless steel

[J]. Journal of Microscopy, 2007, 228(Pt 3): 373-383. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01850.x.
百度学术谷歌学术
51MA Q, LI B, OPPEDAL A L, et al.

Strain rate dependence of twinning at 450 ℃ and its effect on microstructure of an extruded magnesium alloy

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2013, 559: 314-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.104.
百度学术谷歌学术
52KLIMANEK P, PÖTZSCH A.

Microstructure evolution under compressive plastic deformation of magnesium at different temperatures and strain rates

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2002, 324(1, 2): 145-150. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01297-7.
百度学术谷歌学术
53YIN D L, ZHANG K F, WANG G F, et al.

Warm deformation behavior of hot-rolled AZ31 Mg alloy

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2005, 392(1, 2): 320-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.039.
百度学术谷歌学术
54SHEN Jing-yuan, ZHANG Ling-yu, HU Lian-xi, et al.

Effect of subgrain and the associated DRX behaviour on the texture modification of Mg-6.63Zn-0.56Zr alloy during hot tensile deformation

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2021, 823: 141745. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141745.
百度学术谷歌学术
55HAZELI K, ASKARI H, CUADRA J, et al.

Microstructure-sensitive investigation of magnesium alloy fatigue

[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2015, 68: 55-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.10.010.
百度学术谷歌学术
56GAO P, ZHU S Q, AN X H, et al.

Effect of sample orientation and initial microstructures on the dynamic recrystallization of a Magnesium alloy

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2017, 691: 150-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.047.
百度学术谷歌学术
57ZHU S Q, YAN H G, LIAO X Z, et al.

Mechanisms for enhanced plasticity in magnesium alloys

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2015, 82: 344-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.006.
百度学术谷歌学术
58HONG S G, PARK S H, LEE C S.

Strain path dependence of {101¯2} twinning activity in a polycrystalline magnesium alloy

[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2011, 64(2): 145-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.030.
百度学术谷歌学术
59HONG S G, PARK S H, LEE C S.

Role of {101¯2} twinning characteristics in the deformation behavior of a polycrystalline magnesium alloy

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(18): 5873-5885. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.002.
百度学术谷歌学术
60YU Hui-hui, XIN Yun-chang, WANG Mao-yin, et al.

Hall-Petch relationship in Mg alloys: A review

[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2018, 34(2): 248-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.022.
百度学术谷歌学术
62KANG Y H, HUANG Z H, WANG S C, et al.

Effect of pre-deformation on microstructure and mechanical properties of WE43 magnesium alloy II: Aging at 250 and 300 ℃

[J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2020, 8(1): 103-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2019.11.012.
百度学术谷歌学术
63JIANG M G, XU C, YAN H, et al.

Unveiling the formation of basal texture variations based on twinning and dynamic recrystallization in AZ31 magnesium alloy during extrusion

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2018, 157: 53-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.014.
百度学术谷歌学术
64WANG M, XU X Y, WANG H Y, et al.

Evolution of dislocation and twin densities in a Mg alloy at quasi-static and high strain rates

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2020, 201: 102-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.082.
百度学术谷歌学术
65XIAO Hong-chao, TANG Bei, LIU Chu-ming, et al.

Dynamic precipitation in a Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy during hot compression

[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 645: 241-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.08.022.
百度学术谷歌学术
66LU S H, WU D, CHEN R S, et al.

Reasonable utilization of {101¯2} twin for optimizing microstructure and improving mechanical property in a Mg-Gd-Y alloy

[J]. Materials & Design, 2020, 191: 108600. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020. 108600.
百度学术谷歌学术
67MCQUEEN H J, IMBERT C A C.

Dynamic recrystallization: Plasticity enhancing structural development

[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2004, 378(1, 2): 35-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.10.067.
百度学术谷歌学术
68GUO X Q, CHAPUIS A, WU P D, et al.

On twinning and anisotropy in rolled Mg alloy AZ31 under uniaxial compression

[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2015, 64: 42-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015. 03.012.
百度学术谷歌学术
69KOIKE J, KOBAYASHI T, MUKAI T, et al.

The activity of non-basal slip systems and dynamic recovery at room temperature in fine-grained AZ31B magnesium alloys

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51(7): 2055-2065. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00005-3.
百度学术谷歌学术
70SONG G S, CHEN Q Q, ZHANG S H, et al.

Deformation micro-mechanism for compression of magnesium alloys at room temperature analyzed by electron backscatter diffraction

[J]. Materials & Design (1980-2015), 2015, 65: 534-542. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.061.
百度学术谷歌学术
71ZHANG Kai, SHAO Zhu-tao, JIANG Jun.

Effects of twin-twin interactions and deformation bands on the nucleation of recrystallization in AZ31 magnesium alloy

[J]. Materials & Design, 2020, 194: 108936. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020. 108936.
百度学术谷歌学术
72BEAUSIR B, SUWAS S, TÓTH L S, et al.

Analysis of texture evolution in magnesium during equal channel angular extrusion

[J]. Acta Materialia, 2008, 56(2): 200-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.032.
百度学术谷歌学术
注释

ZHANG Hong-yang, NIE Hui-hui, XU Xiong and LIANG Wei declare that they have no conflict of interest.

ZHANG Hong-yang, NIE Hui-hui, XU Xiong, LIANG Wei. Abnormal texture and sensitivity to strain rate during hot-tension of Mg alloy sheets [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2025, 32(3): 991-1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-025-5926-2.

张洪洋,聂慧慧,许雄等.镁合金板在热拉伸过程中的特殊织构和应变速率敏感性[J].中南大学学报(英文版),2025,32(3):991-1007.